Replicant: Issueshttps://redmine.replicant.us/https://redmine.replicant.us/favicon.ico?15984615062021-12-07T17:01:35ZReplicant
Redmine Replicant infrastructure - Issue #2288 (Resolved): Update the matterbridge package in Guixhttps://redmine.replicant.us/issues/22882021-12-07T17:01:35ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.orgReplicant - Issue #1980 (New): Meta bug for the SIM cards not being recognizedhttps://redmine.replicant.us/issues/19802019-12-12T17:37:17ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.orgReplicant - Feature #1878 (New): Make f-droid be FSDG compliant again to be able to include it ag...https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/18782018-04-23T17:36:36ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>It's several been years that f-droid is not FSDG compliant (anymore?).</p>
<p>The easiest solution would be to:<br />- Remove f-droid in Replicant source code<br />- Write a blog post on why it was removed</p>
<p>Once removed it will probably create more incentive to look for acceptable solutions.</p> Replicant - Issue #1635 (In Progress): F-droid Antifeature:NonFreeAssets wiki page is unclearhttps://redmine.replicant.us/issues/16352016-02-06T16:59:13ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>Work with upstream to clarify the definition of this anti-feature.</p>
<p>While the NonFreeAssets (<a class="external" href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeature:NonFreeAssets">https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeature:NonFreeAssets</a>) seem to be very similar to the "Non-functional Data" definition in <a class="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html</a>, it has a lot of room for interpretation and makes it way to easy to have differing interpretations.</p> Replicant - Feature #1629 (In Progress): F-Droid does not respect the GNU free system distributio...https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/16292016-02-04T13:20:05ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>The guidelines are here: <a class="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html</a></p>
<p>While I didn't find a smoking gun yet, the following page raises some concern:<br /><a class="external" href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures">https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures</a></p>
<p>To check:</p>
<p>1) What, practically speaking, each anti-feature really is.<br /> For instance the description of the advertizing anti-feature says that no applications is known to have it,<br /> but the list of application with that anti-feature is not empty.<br /> We should check with upstream and fix the descriptions if we can.<br />2) Look if Replicant is affected<br /> For instance Firefox exist in f-droid but it's not possible to run on Replicant.<br /> Still, Firefox should not be possible to install on Replicant because it can suggest non-free add ons.<br />3) List and check well known suspicious applications such as firefox.<br />4) List and check emulators, Parabola has a good reference on it here:<br /> <a class="external" href="https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues">https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues</a></p>
<p>If no issues are to be found, Documentation should be made more clear.</p>
If issues are to be found, F-droid will have to be fixed upstream, not to show any application with anti-features to Replicant users.<br />We should also look which implementations would satisfy the guidelines requirements:
<ul>
<li>Should the filter be made automatic and not possible to disable.</li>
<li>Can the filter be a setting, and be enabled by default on Replicant.</li>
<li>Can upstream simply remove applications with anti-features?<br />Having F-droid fixed upstream is desirable not to have to maintain a fork.</li>
</ul> Replicant - Issue #1623 (Rejected): Check extensively if f-droid repositories still respects the ...https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/16232016-02-04T13:18:44ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>The guidelines are here: <a class="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html</a></p>
<p>While I didn't find a smoking gun yet, the following page raises some concern:<br /><a class="external" href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures">https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures</a></p>
<p>To check:</p>
<p>1) What, practically speaking, each anti-feature really is.<br /> For instance the description of the advertizing anti-feature says that no applications is known to have it,<br /> but the list of application with that anti-feature is not empty.<br /> We should check with upstream and fix the descriptions if we can.<br />2) Look if Replicant is affected<br /> For instance Firefox exist in f-droid but it's not possible to run on Replicant.<br /> Still, Firefox should not be possible to install on Replicant because it can suggest non-free add ons.<br />3) List and check well known suspicious applications such as firefox.<br />4) List and check emulators, Parabola has a good reference on it here:<br /> <a class="external" href="https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues">https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues</a></p>
<p>If no issues are to be found, Documentation should be made more clear.</p>
<p>If issues are to be found, F-droid will have to be fixed upstream, not to show any application with anti-features to Replicant users.<br />We should also look which implementations would satisfy the guidelines requirements:</p>
<p><del>> Should the filter be made automatic and not possible to disable.<br /></del>> Can the filter be a setting, and be enabled by default on Replicant.<br />-> Can upstream simply remove applications with anti-features?<br />Having F-droid fixed upstream is desirable not to have to maintain a fork.</p> Replicant - Issue #1617 (Rejected): Check extensively if f-droid repositories still respects the ...https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/16172016-02-04T13:17:26ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>The guidelines are here: <a class="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html</a></p>
<p>While I didn't find a smoking gun yet, the following page raises some concern:<br /><a class="external" href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures">https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures</a></p>
<p>To check:</p>
<p>1) What, practically speaking, each anti-feature really is.<br /> For instance the description of the advertizing anti-feature says that no applications is known to have it,<br /> but the list of application with that anti-feature is not empty.<br /> We should check with upstream and fix the descriptions if we can.<br />2) Look if Replicant is affected<br /> For instance Firefox exist in f-droid but it's not possible to run on Replicant.<br /> Still, Firefox should not be possible to install on Replicant because it can suggest non-free add ons.<br />3) List and check well known suspicious applications such as firefox.<br />4) List and check emulators, Parabola has a good reference on it here:<br /> <a class="external" href="https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues">https://wiki.parabola.nu/Emulator_licensing_issues</a></p>
<p>If no issues are to be found, Documentation should be made more clear.</p>
<p>If issues are to be found, F-droid will have to be fixed upstream, not to show any application with anti-features to Replicant users.<br />We should also look which implementations would satisfy the guidelines requirements:<br /><del>> Should the filter be made automatic and not possible to disable.<br /></del>> Can the filter be a setting, and be enabled by default on Replicant.<br />-> Can upstream simply remove applications with anti-features?<br />Having F-droid fixed upstream is desirable not to have to maintain a fork.</p> Replicant - Issue #18 (Closed): Cyanogen boot animation needs to be replaced by the Replicant onehttps://redmine.replicant.us/issues/182011-03-02T17:44:23ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>At boot there is a cyanogen logo shown.<br />We need our own logo(else there are some trademarks issues).</p> Replicant - Issue #10 (Closed): Build system: publish sources(images not even published) and howt...https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/102010-09-28T16:20:19ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
<p>This is ultra-high piority.<br />We must publish the sources on gitorious.</p> Replicant - Issue #4 (Closed): unknown: make US/ADP phones work with the rilhttps://redmine.replicant.us/issues/42009-10-13T17:11:51ZDenis 'GNUtoo' CarikliGNUtoo@cyberdimension.org
Status:
<ul>
<li>fixed for htcdream on replicant 2.2</li>
<li>waiting for a tester for nexusone on replicant 2.2</li>
</ul>