Issue #1767
closedSMS not received / Replicant 6.0
100%
Description
Every-time the message length is > 160 characters, the SMS is never received by my contacts.
I also installed Silence IM to test & confirm and same behavior than the default SMS application.
This is 100% reproducible.
Something else which is not 100% reproducible (but very close to) is a random behavior where some messages
with special character like 'ê' or 'ç' or accent or "-" and less than 160 characters are never received either.
Removing the special character and sending the same message works (received by my contacts)
Where it is difficult to find a logic is that writing only a couple of letters with a special character works !
Like: "ça va" as a whole message works...
Going back to Stock ROM on the same phone / same SIM and all the issues gone, no issue on 4.2
Updated by Loic Dachary over 7 years ago
For the record this is using the Replicant 6.0, at least for the Samsung Galaxy S3 instructions
Updated by Wolfgang Wiedmeyer over 7 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Resolution set to fixed
Fixed with this commit: https://code.fossencdi.org/hardware_ril_samsung-ril.git/commit/?h=replicant-6.0&id=3935ea6f21e4f42024a025de2cc3fb6bc1816002
As discussed on irc, the issue with special characters was very likely only happening with multipart messages, so it's also fixed with the commit.
Updated by Wolfgang Wiedmeyer over 7 years ago
The previous mentioned commit didn't fix the issue reliable. Found a much easier solution which should finally fix it:
https://code.fossencdi.org/hardware_ril_samsung-ril.git/commit/?h=replicant-6.0&id=8fc4ebed2b2fd094f09f329fd284b4ce916271c7
Updated by la belette over 7 years ago
Wolfgang many thanks !
I am impatient to see your next version with all theses bug solved :)
Updated by Wolfgang Wiedmeyer over 7 years ago
I released the next version that has this issue fixed. See the updated forum post.
Updated by la belette over 7 years ago
cool :)
I guess there is a typo it is build date: 8.1.17 instead of build date: 8.1.16 ?
So the zip is from today right ?
Updated by Wolfgang Wiedmeyer over 7 years ago
belette belette wrote:
I guess there is a typo it is build date: 8.1.17 instead of build date: 8.1.16 ?
So the zip is from today right ?
Yes, of course :)
Thanks, should be fixed now!