Project

General

Profile

Actions

Upstream » History » Revision 11

« Previous | Revision 11/434 (diff) | Next »
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 02/21/2018 04:14 PM
According to paulk, upstream is used accross the wiki, so use that


Upstream

Benefits of using Upstream Linux

Currently, Replicant uses device specific Hardware Abstraction Layers, because device manufacturers implemented non-standard kernel interfaces. However, Android works with upstream kernels and supports plug-n-play hardware nowadays, so it makes sense to have generic Hardware Abstraction Layers for the standard interfaces of the Linux kernel (ALSA, V4L2, etc).

Benefits:
  • It would allow supporting external WiFi dongles such as the ones supported by the ath9k_htc driver and free firmwares without the need for a specific application or configuration.
  • It would make devices last longer by alleviating the device specific maintenance burden: If LineageOS stops supporting a Replicant supported device, Replicant would need to maintain it by its own. This would require a lot of work, unless the device is already supported the upstream Linux kernel and generic hardware abstractions layers. This would enable Replicant to support devices that are not currently supported by LineageOS.
  • It would enable the support for devices that are or will be added to upstream Linux.

Requirements

  • Adding a generic WiFi HAL for external dongles only requires a device that is supported by Replicant, and that can provide enough power for the dongle.
  • For the other standard interfaces (like ASLA, etc) a device running a upstream Linux Kenrel with as few patches as possible is required.

Devices

It is best to use a device that requires the least amount of work to be functional under Replicant.
More precisely we want to minimize:
  • The work needed to have the device usable with upstream Linux.
  • The work porting or writing Android hardware abstractions layers.
To achieve that we can choose a device that:
  • requires no or very minimal work to be fully supported by Linux.
  • have less hardware features (so we don't need to support them in Linux and in the HALs).
  • is easy to buy, so the work can be shared among multiple people.

It is also a good idea to keep one image per device, as trying to make a single image that
would work on all ARM device supported by upstream Linux is complicated: Even ARM GNU/Linux
distributions still have some issues with that.

Smartphones and tablets with a free software bootloader and work in progress upstream Linux support

Device dts comments
P970 (Optimus Black) omap3-sniper.dts no display(no driver), very few peripherals

Replicant supported Samsung Exynos devices

Device dts
i9100 (Galaxy S II) exynos4210-trats.dts
i9300 (Galaxy S III) exynos4412-trats2.dts

Allwinner devices

See also

Updated by Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli about 6 years ago · 11 revisions

Also available in: PDF HTML TXT